Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 33 HP more power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Hyundai Matrix. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 27 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Runner has 80 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
| |