Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Runner engine produces 20 HP less power than Honda Stream, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Runner reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 8.6 | |
|
The Honda Stream is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Runner consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Runner could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Runner gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Runner engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Runner engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.59 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is 28 cm shorter than the Honda Stream, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 1520 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 280 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda Stream, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Honda Stream has
| |