Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991 vs Renault Espace 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Espace can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.9 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 133 HP | 98 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 161 - 176 NM | 168 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 - 17.8 seconds | 10.6 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 9.8 | 6.6 - 13.7 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Espace. On average, Mitsubishi Space Runner equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.77 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 25 cm shorter than the Renault Espace, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 676 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1498 litres | 2850 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 401 litres more trunk space than the Renault Espace. The Renault Espace may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1352 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Espace, which means Mitsubishi Space Runner can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`773 | ~ 2`363 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Renault Espace has
| |