Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Honda CR-V 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Space Runner is available with front wheel drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 150 HP | 128 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 - 225 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 - 13.3 seconds | 10.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 - 10.1 | 9.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.29 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Runner is 24 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1800 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Runner has 55 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 1130 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Runner is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`900 | ~ 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |