Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Space Runner
1999 - 2002
Isuzu Rodeo
1998 - 2004
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Space Runner is available only with front wheel drive, while Isuzu Rodeo can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.42.2 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 136 - 150 HP130 - 208 HP
Torque: 178 - 225 NM195 - 290 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 - 13.3 secondsn/a seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.0 - 10.110.5 - 12.5
Mitsubishi Space Runner petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Isuzu Rodeo.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.29 m4.50 m
Width: 1.70 m1.79 m
Height: 1.65 m1.70 m
Mitsubishi Space Runner is smaller.
Mitsubishi Space Runner is 21 cm shorter than the Isuzu Rodeo, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Runner is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 430 litres933 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1800 litres2297 litres
Isuzu Rodeo has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Space Runner has 503 litres less trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 497 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`900~ 2`191
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 600no data
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Runner has
  • lower fuel consumption
Isuzu Rodeo has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv