Mitsubishi Pajero 2014 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 178 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 261 NM | 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 69 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 309 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.2 | 7.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 705 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1180 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 32 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Chrysler 300C | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.78 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 782 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1554 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 119 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`949 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 400 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |