Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota 4-Runner 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 5 HP more power than Toyota 4-Runner, but torque is 53 NM less than Toyota 4-Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 12.6 | |
|
The Toyota 4-Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota 4-Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Part time 4WD | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 1195 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 532 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`440 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |