Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Dodge Durango 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 294 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 353 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 44 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 11.2 | |
|
The Dodge Durango is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 345 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 663 litres | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 490 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 663 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2410 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 2`948 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Durango has
| |