Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 52 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.7 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 465 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |