Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 19.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 12.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 13.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 is 42 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero 2001, so Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |