Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 15 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |