Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota RAV4 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 16 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |