Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 52 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 118 NM more than Ford Maverick. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 11.1 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |