Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 44 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 16 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |