Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 48 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 128 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero and Hyundai Tucson are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |