Mitsubishi Pajero 1994 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 208 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 18 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 16.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1080 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 1080 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2050 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |