Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 208 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 30 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 1 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 14.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 29 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 47 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2033 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |