Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 208 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 7 HP more power than Lexus RX, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Lexus RX. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 13.0 | |
|
The Lexus RX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.66 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 24 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1725 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres less than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Lexus RX has
| |