Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 194 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 313 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 | 16.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |