Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 9 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 8 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 13.1 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.63 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 45 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1315 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |