Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 110 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 7 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |