Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 65 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 68 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 6 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 30 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |