Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs BMW X5 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.8 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
BMW X5 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 59 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 118 NM less than BMW X5. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.5 | 9.6 | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 435 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 92 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The BMW X5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.70 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the BMW X5, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW X5. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`685 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | BMW X5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than BMW X5, so BMW X5 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
BMW X5 has
| |