Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 384 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 25 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 11 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 11.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 415 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1253 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 689 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 794 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |