Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 53 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 415 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1909 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space (by 563 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 209 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`810 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |