Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 250 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 60 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.5 | 16.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2047 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`300 | 2`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 11 600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |