Mitsubishi Pajero 2008 vs Nissan Patrol 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 441 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Patrol, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Nissan Patrol. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Patrol. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 820 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Terrano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Patrol might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm shorter than the Nissan Patrol, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 810 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 2226 litres | |
|
Nissan Patrol has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 595 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Patrol. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Patrol (by 436 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Patrol, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`910 | 3`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan Patrol has
| |