Mitsubishi Pajero 2011 vs Toyota Highlander 2013

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2011 - 2014
Toyota Highlander
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Highlander can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Toyota Highlander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs.
Engines: 3.82.7 - 3.5

Performance

Power: 250 HP188 - 280 HP
Torque: 329 NM252 - 337 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds7.3 - 10.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.58.4 - 10.6
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Highlander.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.90 m4.87 m
Width: 1.88 m1.93 m
Height: 1.87 m1.73 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm longer than the Toyota Highlander, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 663 litres391 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2370 litres
Mitsubishi Pajero has more luggage capacity.
Mitsubishi Pajero has 272 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Highlander.
Turning diameter: no data5.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`910~ 2`741
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data21 800
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • roomier boot
Toyota Highlander has
  • also available in 2WD
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv