Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Jeep Cherokee 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jeep Cherokee can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Jeep Cherokee also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.5 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 208 HP | 116 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 313 NM | 198 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 19.5 seconds | 10.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 14.3 | 9.5 - 14.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 46 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2033 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |