Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.8 - 3.5 | 2.8 - 4.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 - 208 HP | 91 - 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 - 313 NM | 188 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 19.5 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.4 - 14.3 | 11.2 - 17.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Land Cruiser. On average, Mitsubishi Pajero equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.90 m | 1.91 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 832 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`300 | ~ 2`993 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |