Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997

 
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2001
Mitsubishi Galant
1997 - 2004
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP136 HP
Torque: 178 NM178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10 seconds9.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Galant 1997 and Mitsubishi Galant 1997 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mitsubishi Galant 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.5
Real fuel consumption: 9.3 l/100km9.3 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Galant 1997 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Galant 1997 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant 1997, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Galant 1997 could require 75 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 64 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway960 km on highway
680 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Galant 1997 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 520'000 km520'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 44 years44 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.63 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.42 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Galant 1997 and Mitsubishi Galant 1997 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1400 litres1400 litres
Mitsubishi Galant 1997 has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Galant 1997 has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant 1997.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data1`850
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10002000
Rating in user reviews: 5.8/10 5.8/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Galant has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Galant has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv