Mitsubishi Galant 1997 vs Audi A6 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 178 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Galant engine produces 29 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Galant reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Galant is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Galant consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Galant over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Galant consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Galant engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 44 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | Used also on Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Galant might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is smaller. Mitsubishi Galant is 17 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Galant is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1400 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Galant has 81 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Galant is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means Mitsubishi Galant can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Mitsubishi Galant has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi A6 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Galant quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Galant has
|
Audi A6 has
| |