Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Renault Megane 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 90 - 265 HP | |
Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 151 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 6 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 4.2 - 8.4 | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 148 mm (5.8 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Eclipse can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.30 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.36 m | 1.43 m | |
Mitsubishi Eclipse is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Eclipse is 29 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Eclipse is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
445 litres | 1024 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`809 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Renault Megane has
| |