Mitsubishi Eclipse 2009 vs Audi TT 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.4 - 3.8 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 162 - 265 HP | 160 - 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 355 NM | 250 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 4.3 - 7.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 11.6 | 5.3 - 9.2 | |
|
Mitsubishi Eclipse petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.35 m | |
| Mitsubishi Eclipse is 39 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
445 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Eclipse is 1.3 metres more than that of the Audi TT, which means Mitsubishi Eclipse can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`920 | ~ 1`755 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Eclipse has
|
Audi TT has
| |