Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Mitsubishi Galant 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 176 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Galant is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Carisma and Mitsubishi Galant have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Carisma torque is 26 NM less than Mitsubishi Galant. Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Carisma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Galant. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Carisma gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Carisma might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is smaller. Mitsubishi Carisma is 19 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Galant, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
430 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 10 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Galant. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Galant (by 970 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Galant, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mitsubishi Galant, so Mitsubishi Carisma quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 5.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
| |