Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Nissan Almera 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Carisma engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan Almera, but torque is 1 NM more than Nissan Almera. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Carisma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Almera is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Carisma could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Carisma consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Almera gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma is 28 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | 355 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
660 litres | 1020 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Carisma has 85 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Almera. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`630 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan Almera has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Carisma has serious deffects in 440 percent more cases than Nissan Almera, so Nissan Almera quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |