Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1997

 
Mitsubishi Carisma
1996 - 2000
Mitsubishi Carisma
1997 - 2003
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP100 HP
Torque: 137 NM137 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.3 seconds15 seconds
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Carisma 1997, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.08.3
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
880 km on highway950 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.40 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 and Mitsubishi Carisma 1997 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
660 litres460 litres
Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma 1997. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma 1996 (by 200 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6301`630
Safety:
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 8001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons:
    Mitsubishi Carisma has
    • more power
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv