Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 140 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 265 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 15 seconds | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.4 | 6.9 - 8.0 | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is larger. Mitsubishi Carisma is 16 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | ~ 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |