Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Honda Civic 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.9 | 1.3 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 - 140 HP | 95 - 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 265 NM | 123 - 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 15 seconds | 7.5 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 - 8.4 | 4.6 - 9.8 | |
|
On average, the Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.46 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Carisma is smaller. Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
460 litres | 1190 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Carisma has 25 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Civic (by 730 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`673 | ~ 1`679 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Carisma has
|
Honda Civic has
| |