Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Volvo S40 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Carisma
1995 - 2005
Volvo S40
1995 - 2000
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.6 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 90 - 140 HP90 - 200 HP
Torque: 137 - 265 NM143 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 15 seconds7.3 - 13 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 8.35.6 - 9.7
Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Mitsubishi Carisma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.48 m
Width: 1.71 m1.72 m
Height: 1.40 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Carisma and Volvo S40 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres471 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1150 litres853 litres
Mitsubishi Carisma has 31 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 297 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Mitsubishi Carisma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`696~ 1`756
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 800600
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 7.1/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S40 has
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv