Mitsubishi Carisma 1995 vs Mazda 3 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Carisma
1995 - 2005
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 1.91.3 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 90 - 140 HP84 - 160 HP
Torque: 137 - 265 NM122 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.2 - 15 seconds9 - 14.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.4 - 8.35.0 - 8.2
Mitsubishi Carisma petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, Mitsubishi Carisma equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.45 m
Width: 1.71 m1.76 m
Height: 1.40 m1.46 m
Mitsubishi Carisma is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Carisma is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 440 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1150 litres878 litres
Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Carisma has 41 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Carisma uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Carisma (by 272 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Carisma is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`696~ 1`728
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 8001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.9/10 8.2/10
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • lower price
Mazda 3 has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv