Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.1 seconds | 19.1 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 12 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Despite less power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 4 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |