Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 8 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Despite the higher power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 6.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 18 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 1.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |