Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Renault Trafic 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 23 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 10.2 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.97 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is smaller. Mercedes Vito is 12 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`905 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |