Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 23 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 48 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Despite the higher power, Mercedes Vito reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.6 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes Vito consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes Vito could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes Vito engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 39 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 18 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 2.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes Vito has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |