Mercedes Vito 2003 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Mercedes Vito engine produces 31 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 42 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes Vito) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | no data | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | no data | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | no data | 1.75 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |