Mercedes Vito 1996 vs Seat Alhambra 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 - 174 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 - 237 NM | 170 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.7 - 20.6 seconds | 12 - 19.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 13.8 | 6.4 - 11.5 | |
|
Mercedes Vito petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Mercedes Vito equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Mercedes Vito is larger. Mercedes Vito is 4 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes Vito is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes Vito is 0.7 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Mercedes Vito can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`800 | ~ 1`886 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |