Mercedes A class 2009 vs Nissan Micra 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 110 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Mercedes A class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes A class engine produces 15 HP more power than Nissan Micra, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Micra. Thanks to more power Mercedes A class reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Micra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes A class consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes A class could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes A class consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Micra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes A class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 370'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mercedes B klase | Used also on Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Micra might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mercedes A class engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Mercedes A class is larger. Mercedes A class is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Micra, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes A class is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1132 litres | |
|
Mercedes A class has more luggage capacity. Mercedes A class has 170 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Micra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 238 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes A class is 1.7 metres more than that of the Nissan Micra, which means Mercedes A class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`740 | 1`425 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Mercedes A class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Micra has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mercedes A class, so Mercedes A class quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes A klase has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |