Mercedes A class 2015 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Mercedes A class
2015 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 102 HP104 HP
Torque: 400 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds13.6 seconds
Mercedes A class is more dynamic to drive.
Mercedes A class engine produces 2 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 256 NM more than Mazda 3. Despite less power, Mercedes A class reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.46.5
The Mercedes A class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes A class consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Mercedes A class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
Mercedes A class gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 93 mm (3.7 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.30 m4.47 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.45 m
Mercedes A class is smaller.
Mercedes A class is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes A class is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 341 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1157 litres1263 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Mercedes A class has 23 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 106 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes A class is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Mercedes A class can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`935no data
Safety:
Mercedes A class scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda 3 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
high

average
Mercedes A class has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mercedes A class, so Mercedes A class quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18 6007800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes A klase has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Mazda 3 has
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv