Mercedes A class 1997 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.9 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 - 125 HP | 115 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 180 NM | 157 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 18.8 seconds | 7.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 8.2 | 6.9 - 10.5 | |
|
Mercedes A class petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. On average, Mercedes A class equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.58 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.55 m | |
| Mercedes A class is 74 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mercedes A class is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes A class is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Mercedes A class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`527 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes A klase has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |